Posts Tagged ‘Career Planning’

What is the risk in changing careers, self-employment, going back to college, lateral moves, or a dead end job?

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

Question: “I recently left a full-time job to start my own consulting business and wonder what effect this change might have on my career? What downside risk is there in quiting work to go back to school, making a lateral move or staying in a dead end job?”

What are the career consequences if your attempt at self-employment fails and you decide to go back to work? I don’t think you have much to fear. Your career will suffer nothing more than a delay; employers will not hold your entrepreneurial effort against you when considering you for a job. Of course, going back to your former career becomes more difficult with the passage of time as your career skills and knowledge of developments in the field become rusty.

As for the other items on your list: going back to college is not a risk, as you are improving your value as an employee, but only if you acquire technical knowledge you can use on the job–electrical engineering, for example–or general business knowledge, as with an MBA. Otherwise the value gained may be less than what is lost by taking the time off from your career. The one exception is when you become qualified in an unrelated, but intersecting area. An engineer, for example, who earns a degree in law can move to the firm’s legal department and likely secure a substantial increase in compensation.

Changing careers is clearly a risk vs. reward proposition with outcomes ranging from completely unknown to relatively foreseeable. If the field in which you work is in decline (say, film-based photography), the lowest risk option is to leverage your existing skills to enter another field that has long-term growth potential, even if you must take a short term cut in pay.

When changing careers, the least risky move is one that takes advantage of your most valuable knowledge and skills. As a business consultant, are speaking and writing–the skills you now sell–your strongest and most valuable skills? Is knowledge of corporate behavior your strongest area of expertise? Will businesses or consumers be willing to pay more for your expertise and knowledge in these areas than any of your other skills or abilities? If the answer is “no,” then you have taken on more risk than necessary and your willingness to do so is strictly a personal decision. However, you mitigate the extent of your career risk by having a fallback option whereby you can seek employment in the field where your skills and experience are most highly valued.

Staying in a dead end job is like keeping your money in a safe deposit box–there is little risk of theft, but your asset loses value every day compared with money deposited in an interest bearing account. Ideally, one avoids becoming employed in a dead end job in the first place, but for younger workers, a dead end job may be the best job option available at the time a choice must be made. Most people solve the dead end job problem by moving on after several years when future advancement in income and responsibility become less likely.

Making a lateral move is not as much of an issue as the other four concerns you list. If there is no increase in pay or responsibility in the new job, one might still be better off doing the same work for the same pay at a company whose future prospects are brighter, or where advancement opportunities are more plentiful.

Michael G Smith

What is the most common mistake job seekers make?

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

The most common mistake, surprisingly, is job seekers don’t anticipate that hiring managers will perform an internet search to find out more about them. This oversight can result in two different problems: 1. negative information that comes to light; and, 2. positive information is available, but not found.

It is always prudent to consider the potential career consequences of our actions, but with an increasing amount of real-time and historical information available on the Web, the likelihood is now much greater that missteps will be discovered by potential employers, even many years after the fact.

Some sources of information are obvious: photo posting sites, forums, blogs, and social networking sites. But less obvious sources are just as important. Google, for example, keeps Web pages cached and available to searchers. So even if a page has been taken down, it will come up in a Google search and can be accessed by clicking on the “Cached” link in Google’s results. ZoomInfo.com permanently stores Web pages that mention individuals by name and can be retrieved from their cache at any time.

In addition to your name, employers will Google your phone number, email address, former employers, and anything else on your resume that might produce a “hit” when combined with your first or last name, city or state. Before you send out a resume, perform each of these searches so you know what potential problems await you.

There are sources other than Google that employers may check; the most intimidating, perhaps, is Lexis-Nexis, which can search and retrieve nearly every newspaper, magazine, radio or TV story from the last twenty years, or more. Though not as extensive as Lexis-Nexis, public and university libraries offer full text access for written and transmitted stories.

Finally, there are many ways in which “legal” records can be retrieved at little or no cost from online databases. If you have a corporation registered in your name, marriage, divorce, bankruptcy, tax delinquency, civil or criminal court proceeding, or any type of state professional license, the records are generally available. Even traffic and parking tickets can sometimes be retrieved.

Information that enhances your reputation will aid your job quest. Attention must be paid, though, to assuring the information will be found. A Google search may miss something if it is associated with a less common variation of your name. I consistently use “Michael G Smith” as my name online, since anything associated with “Mike Smith” or “Michael Smith” will be listed so far down in Google’s results they won’t be seen. It’s important to decide what your name is and then stick with that exact form. “Kate Smith” is not the same, in Google’s eyes, as “Kathleen Smith,” “Bill Board” is not the same as “William Board,” and “James R Towne” is not the same as “James Towne.”

Finally, sites where individuals create and edit their own records are of critical importance. You have no control over much of what comes up in a Google search, but the employer knows you alone control the information at sites such as LinkedIn, Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and so on. Content you post can be a liability if it is inconsistent or potentially embarrassing—your resume and your LinkedIn work history, for example, had better agree. On the plus side, if you anticipate that potential employers will view your profile, then you can emphasize your accomplishments and achievements in order to make a good impression.

You must decide what your purpose is in having a presence on these sites. Your profile on LinkedIn—currently, the most important business networking site—should not feature activities that detract from your “day job,” as that will give the impression your focus is not on work. If you are a fundraising professional and have a political blog that is compatible with the outlook of the organization you work for, that’s fine. But if your profile emphasizes a personal business you operate on the side, a reasonable person will conclude you are stretched too thin and your attention is divided.

Michael G Smith

What simple advice would you give to someone starting a career?

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Work hard, focus on real results that benefit your employer and your employer’s customers, make your boss look good, and uphold the highest level of personal integrity.

Their are no shortcuts or “secrets” to success; just hard work, honesty and getting things done.

Michael G Smith